I got one with specific instructions for the Distinguished Professor but I don’t think anything else went out.

My own takeaway from the Mayor’s speech is that he doesn’t really understand the City Colleges. Looking around at the people around me, I didn’t see many “kids,” a word he used at least 9 times. During that part, I received a text from a colleague who was watching online saying, “Has anyone mentioned our students’ average age to the Mayor?” Apparently not. I was also annoyed when he said something about how it’s a beginning and now they can go out and get a job (totally paraphrasing–I already had a blistering headache by then and I was probably paying more attention to the clock–I’d predicted 11 minutes (loser).

“Ummm…” I thought, “A lot of our people have jobs they want or jobs in fields they want or…” well, you get the picture.

And the “doubling down on our kids” stipend…I’m sure I don’t understand it, but let’s try a thought experiment with what I do understand:

Assume that we have a whole mess of students who actually go out and get the kind of new job that he suggested they might–a career job, a degree based job. Let’s assume that the average salary for those jobs is somewhere around $35,000. (Maybe that’s too high–you can do the experiment with your own numbers if you’d like). The promise was that the city would pick up the first four weeks of salary if the company hired one of our graduates, right? That there’d be a $2 million dollar fund to provide for that. So, a $35,000 a year salary, divided into 26 pay periods comes out to $1346 per pay period; multiplied by four that would be $5284 payed by the city per hire. Which means that a $2 million dollar fund will pay for about 379 students’ first four weeks.

We handed out 3300 Associates Degrees this year.

How, exactly, is that a “doubling down” on our students?

And don’t even get me started about the part on how the graduates from the U of C and Kellogg and blah blah blah (read: them) will start the businesses in Chicago because they have an educated work force (read: our students)…

http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm288/larryo340/Funny%20gifs/bang-head-on-keyboard.gif

(which is to say, D’Oh!!! Sorry!!)

So, apparently there is a bit of a boycott going on by faculty regarding the combined graduation. I understand that this combined graduation is ultimately not as meaningful to the graduates, families and faculty as individual school graduations. The survey taken earlier this semester of students about their preferences for combined/individual ceremony was very clear. Our students want their own graduation. I hope that this can be a reality for them next year.

I left after the Mayor (volunteered and froze in the parking garage, completely different experience from last year). I could have left when the hour long procession began but I wanted to see the speeches. Our distinguished professor sat with our students- which was probably the coolest place to be- along with some other faculty. Not sure how they rated but if I had walked with faculty I would have much rather been seated with our students then along the sides.