More Coverage of the Contract Deal

As mentioned by Todd in the comments, you can read the article from Inside Higher Ed HERE (guess we know who Fran Spielman’s source is now, eh?).

And here’s the Tribune’s Editorial Board’s opinion of our new deal:

The opening of the school year, though, is only the No. 3 education story in Chicago this week. Tops is the settlement at City Colleges, with its reasonable balance of compensation that taxpayers can afford and an emphasis on student progress. The other dominant story, of course, is continuing bombast from Chicago Teachers Union officials who threaten that their members may walk out on children next week. …

We hope CTU members take time from any scheduled rallies to ponder what a strike would do to every child who already is losing the excitement of a new school year to a labor spat among adults. We also hope teachers will think seriously about the new City Colleges contract. That pact’s provision for “student success pay” means that when student outcomes improve — as measured by metrics from the Illinois Board of Higher Education — union members will, as a group, receive bonuses. …

The contract that unifies City Colleges faculty members and administrators in putting students first ought to unsettle CTU members. Chicagoans are likely to view that contract as reasonable. As a logical pattern for a contract that teachers in elementary and high schools would be smart to accept.

But that contract isn’t a game-changer only for union members. It ought to remind district officials that their first priority shouldn’t be avoiding a strike. Their first priority should be a contract that year after year puts students — and student performance — ahead of everything else. The last contract didn’t do that. The next one has to.

We congratulate everyone at City Colleges, faculty and administration alike, for achieving that outcome.

Nothing from the Chronicle yet.

 

 

3 thoughts on “More Coverage of the Contract Deal

  1. Head over to the CCCTU website at http://ccctu.org/archives/4248
    I got a kick out of this line:
    “The City Colleges Board must now vote on the contract agreement. Until it has been approved, the CCCTU will not release any further details about the contract.”

    So we actually voted YES to the details of a contract that we have not seen, nor will see until the board approves? Really? W.T.F?

    How ’bout we vote yes to the 2018 contract now while we’re at it?

    Signed,
    Hangakickmesignonmyback

  2. I’ve been kicking around a conspiracy theory or two, just for fun of course. I was one of the many not to receive a ballot in the snail mail. Yet, I receive all of the other AFT mailings and well as the CCCTU newsletter. How is this possible? Am I wrong to assume that there should be only one mailing list. I know that the address our local folks had on file was my previous one, yet how do I get these other mailings.

    Signed,
    Lookingforclarity/hopingthere’sminimalconspiracyandmaximaltransparency

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s