The Harold Lounge

A Space for HWC (& CCC) Faculty to Congregate

More on Technology: Campus Gossip

Posted by PhiloDave on January 30, 2012

I thought this was a really interesting story about the intersection of people, places, anonymity, commerce, and reputation (coin of the realm!).

It would make a great play, I think.

HERE’s the article; here’s a snippet:

Matt Ivester became notorious on campuses across the country in 2007 for publishing gossip­—not about celebrities but about students—on Juicy-Campus, the Web site he created. The site was blocked by some colleges, banned by several student governments, and threatened with legal action by several students who claimed that defaming comments on the site had inflicted emotional damage.

Now, in an ironic twist, the young man who stubbornly hosted reputation-harming comments on a Web site despite student complaints is looking to reinvent himself as an adviser to help students clean up their online reputations.

 

Posted in Social, Students, Teaching | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Monday Music

Posted by PhiloDave on January 30, 2012

Welcome to the week that kicks off Black History Month.

Let me hear some HORNS!

Posted in Music | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Next Up!

Posted by PhiloDave on January 29, 2012

Next up! is a regular feature on Sundays, showcasing HWC (and beyond) events in the coming week. Use the “Comments” section to provide updates and additions!

I’ve not posted this the last couple of weeks because A) I’ve been totally behind; and B) I’ve been a bit sluggish on Sundays for some reason–winter doldrums, maybe, or Monday blues (even going back into last semester, I suppose, since I was late with it quite a bit last fall); and C) there hasn’t really been anything going on that I’ve known about and thought worthy of the hassle. Still, I’ll try to be a little more timely this term.

Hard to believe it but the semester is 12.5% over! And week 3 is off and running…

Monday, 1/30: New Student Welcome Reception & Resource Fair (2-3:30p, rm 102);

Tuesday, 1/31:  Business as usual as far as I know;

Wednesday, 2/1: Black History Month starts;

Thursday, 2/2: Happy Groundhog Day;

Friday, 2/3: Business as usual as far as I know;

Saturday, 2/4: Business as usual as far as I know.

Please note anything I missed in the comments, please (and accept my apologies for missing it).

Posted in Events | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

New Student Reception–Tomorrow!

Posted by PhiloDave on January 29, 2012

Please announce to your classes tomorrow (From Ellen Goldberg):

New Student Welcome Reception & Resource Fair
Monday, January 30, 2012
2:00-3:30 p.m.
Room 102/103
All new and returning students are welcome to attend. All students will be able to connect with different offices on campus, student groups, listen to music, eat, mingle, and win prizes. Everyone is invited. We will be serving pop, water, 600 cookies, and lots of candy-the good kind.
We would like to welcome students into the City Colleges of Chicago and the Harold Washington College Family! :)

Posted in Events, Students | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »

On Teaching and Cognitive Science

Posted by PhiloDave on January 29, 2012

Following up on yesterday’s post about lectures comes this interesting article about a new book that I can’t wait to get (once it’s in paperback) and read:

The invisible-gorilla experiment is featured in Cathy Davidson’s new book, Now You See It: How the Brain Science of Attention Will Transform the Way We Live, Work, and Learn (Viking, 2011). Davidson is a founder of a nearly 7,000-member organization called Hastac, or the Humanities, Arts, Sciences, and Technology Advanced Collaboratory, that was started in 2002 to promote the use of digital technology in academe. It is closely affiliated with the digital humanities and reflects that movement’s emphasis on collaboration among academics, technologists, publishers, and librarians. Last month I attended Hastac’s fifth conference, held at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

Davidson’s keynote lecture emphasized that many of our educational practices are not supported by what we know about human cognition. At one point, she asked members of the audience to answer a question: “What three things do students need to know in this century?” Without further prompting, everyone started writing down answers, as if taking a test. While we listed familiar concepts such as “information literacy” and “creativity,” no one questioned the process of working silently and alone. And noticing that invisible gorilla was the real point of the exercise.

Most of us are, presumably, the products of compulsory educational practices that were developed during the Industrial Revolution. And the way most of us teach is a relic of the steam age; it is designed to support a factory system by cultivating “attention, timeliness, standardization, hierarchy, specialization, and metrics,” Davidson said. One could say it was based on the best research of the time, but the studies of Frederick Winslow Taylor, among others, that undergird the current educational regime (according to Davidson) depend upon faked data supporting the preconceptions of the managerial class. Human beings don’t function like machines, and it takes a lot of discipline—what we call “classroom management”—to make them conform. Crucial perspectives are devalued and rejected, stifling innovation, collaboration, and diversity.

It wasn’t always that way.

Intrigued? Yes, I was too. Enough to watch the keynote presentation even (available HERE). Cathy Davidson’s presentation begins around the 16 minute mark.

The next big thing? Or just more fetishizing of the new, mistaking the next thing for a better thing? Time will tell, I guess.

UPDATE: If you want to watch the Davidson Keynote in pieces, it divides up this way:

1. Minutes 1-16: Jibber-jabber and introduction of Cathy Davidson.

2. Minutes 16-30:15: The Four Information Ages

3. Minutes 30:15-44:29: Brain Science and Attention (and Attentional Blindness)

4. Minutes 44:29-58:45: Industrial Schooling (A brief history of “Scientific Learning Management”)

5. Minutes 58:45-63:20: Learning for Participation

6. Minutes 63:20-End: 21st Century Skills

 

Posted in Teaching, Technology | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

President Obama’s Speech on Education

Posted by PhiloDave on January 29, 2012

Did you see this yesterday? It’s worth watching. And the commentary HERE is worth reading, too.

 

Posted in News, Politics | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Ditching Lecture: Now With Research!

Posted by PhiloDave on January 28, 2012

John Hader passed this link to an NPR story/podcast about research related to lectures a few weeks back, which I’ve been saving while making plans to unveil it to my students.

Hestenes got the idea for the series when a colleague came to him with a problem. The students in his introductory physics courses were not doing well: Semester after semester, the class average never got above about 40 percent.

“I noted that the reason for that was that his examination questions were mostly qualitative, requiring understanding of the concepts rather than just calculational, using formulas, which is what most of the instructors did,” Hestenes says.

Hestenes had a suspicion students were just memorizing the formulas and never really getting the concepts. So he and a colleague developed a test to look at students’ conceptual understanding of physics. It’s a test Maryland’s Redish has given his students many times.

Here’s a question from the test: “Two balls are the same size but one weighs twice as much as the other. The balls are dropped from the top of a two-story building at the same instant of time. The time it takes the ball to reach the ground will be…”

The possible answers include about half as long for the heavier ball, about half as long for the lighter ball, or the same time for both. This is a fundamental concept but even some people who’ve taken physics get this question wrong…

While most physics students can recite Newton’s second law of motion, Harvard’s Mazur says, the conceptual test developed by Hestenes showed that after an entire semester they understood only about 14 percent more about the fundamental concepts of physics…

The test has now been given to tens of thousands of students around the world and the results are virtually the same everywhere. The traditional lecture-based physics course produces little or no change in most students’ fundamental understanding of how the physical world works.

“The classes only seem to be really working for about 10 percent of the students,” Arizona State’s Hestenes says. “And I maintain, I think all the evidence indicates, that these 10 percent are the students that would learn it even without the instructor. They essentially learn it on their own.”

He says that listening to someone talk is not an effective way to learn any subject.

“Students have to be active in developing their knowledge,” he says. “They can’t passively assimilate it.”

This is something many people have known intuitively for a long time — the physicists just came up with the hard data. Their work, along with research by cognitive scientists, provides a compelling case against lecturing.

It arrived in my mailbox just as my student evaluations did, in which I found the overwhelmingly most frequent suggestion to be something like, “Discussion and student engagement are great, but it would be better if you just lectured more and simply told us what the readings mean.” And I get it–there’s a lot of value in a well done lecture; I don’t deny it.

Furthermore, there’s a satisfying simplicity to class performance that amounts to taking dictation (which is what I truly suspect most (not all) of the students  who made that particular suggestion were asking for–a simpler, more straightforward path to a grade: listen, copy, memorize, repeat. It’s both efficient (for the student), consistent with what some (not all) of them expect schooling to be about, and pretty non-threatening. They figure they can do it or they can’t–it’s schooling as performance. (Just to be clear, I am not universally conflating a lecture based teaching approach with the kind of rote regurgitation approach described above. I recognize that they do not necessarily travel together, and that some of the students asking for more lecture were seeking better understanding and guidance, not merely lists of answers that they could regurgitate. In the student comments, though, that asked for more lecture, most of them included the phrase “just tell us what it (the reading) means.” It is that second part that I am particularly averse to endorsing and particularly interested in disrupting as an expectation of what learning (particularly in higher ed environments) entails.)). And there is an attractiveness about simplicity, especially for stressed out and thinly spread people (like many of our students).

While discussing the evals with my beloved (an educator par excellence, and the person from whom I’ve stolen all of my best ideas), she suggested that I make those critiques front and center in my classes–presenting them to my new groups, saying, “Here’s what students say about my classes. Here’s what they say the want. And here’s why I’m not going to provide that.”

I thought it was a great idea and I plan on doing it (though I’ve decided to let them get into the classes a little bit and see how they work first), and when I do, I’m going to play this story for them.

Because what they want is not always what they need, and what they think is best for them is not always what actually is best for them.

h/t to Hader for the pointer.

Posted in News, Teaching | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

“Business Jobs” Don’t Necessarily Require Business Majors

Posted by PhiloDave on January 27, 2012

This is well worth reading; it’s called “How Art History Majors Power the U.S. Economy” by Virginia Postrel:

“Not everyone is the same. One virtue of a developed economy is that it provides niches for people with many different personalities and talents, making it more likely that any given individual can find a job that offers satisfaction.”

h/t to Erica McCormack for the pointer!

 

 

Erica McCormack

Posted in Curriculum, Fascinating, Work | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

Random Readings

Posted by PhiloDave on January 27, 2012

Here is a bunch of stuff that I’ve collected for you:

~I know I don’t make enough room for reflective solitude in my classroom. This article reminded me how important is to make space in the classroom for a little solitude now and then.

~If you have not yet read these investigatory pieces HERE and HERE (I’m betting that they win the Pulitzer this year) on one of Apple’s manufacturers in China, you need to.

~I liked this article on Metacognition so much that I posted it for one of my classes. It’s a topic that always arouses student interest I think because it puts words and structure to an idea that makes intuitive sense as important and helpful but rarely explained.

~Speaking of arousal, reading this story was horrifying and kind of funny in a “nutty professor” kind of way. Don’t worry–it’s safe for work. I found it here under the title, “Worst Lecture of All, Or Greatest?” from a link on Inside Higher Ed; some of the comments are amusing.

~Have you ever heard of the Collegiate Learning Assessment? I read about it in this article and then went to the site. It’s interesting.

~Ever heard of a “leap second”? I hadn’t, at least not until I read THIS and THIS (with video!).

~I liked this one, advocating for more working and less thinking as a BS prevention strategy.

~A couple that I pegged for administrators (current or future) were this and this–not that any of our administrators don’t already know these things (they do), but just in case they might want to share them with any peers who might not.

~Here’s the list of free museum days through March.

~An important piece on meetings (namely, how to make them better) is HERE.

~There are a number of new faculty who have recently received (or will soon) their first set of student evaluations. I think this post has helpful advice about how to use them productively.

Posted in Reading | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Faculty Council Corner

Posted by PhiloDave on January 27, 2012

Faculty Council Corner is a regular Thursday morning-ish feature (that sometimes shows up later) , presenting an open thread for you to bother your HWFC members with pressing questions (or for us to post the pressing questions that you have). Also, you can expect this to be the forum where we post regular updates about what is happening with Faculty Council and when.

This Week’s Updates: Nothing much new this week. We are, however, semi-desperate to find some faculty who are willing to serve on the District Wide Faculty Council (FC4). They meet on the last Wednesday of every month at 3pm (I think), usually at Malcolm X, and HW is supposed to have three elected members and one appointed by HWFC. As of right now, one of our elected members (unfortunately for us, but due to good things for her) had to resign and has been replaced by appointee (and awesome person) Jess Bader. Another of our elected members is on Sabbatical this spring and still needs a substitute for the rest of the semester. A third of our elected members notified us this week that she won’t be able to continue serving on FC4, given her duties with Reinvention and so also needs to be replaced. Rosie is our HWFC appointee.

In other words, we have two of four possible votes on the District wide council accounted for and two that need appointing. Any and all interested parties are encouraged to contact one of your HWFC reps. Appointees must be full time faculty but need not be tenured. Let us know if you’re interested.

Last “Week’s” Pressing Questions: Nary a one. Nothing, that is, except for what the Mayor’s speech means for our colleges. I guess that one counts. Nothing else, though.

Posted in Faculty, FC4, HWFC | Tagged: , , | 5 Comments »

Website Wednesday: CCC Edition

Posted by Realist on January 25, 2012

With consent from blogmaster PhiloDave, this is a special edition of Website Wednesday that will appear from time to time over the course of the semester. The focus will be our newly designed HWC website, and the CCC website in general, in an effort to give the folks at District some feedback on what we believe to be working or not working with the sites.

Where to begin? Well, a bit o’ history might be helpful. Go to this post and read all the replies to get all caught up on some initial feedback on the reinvented webpages. You’ll note that Audrey Berns, Executive Director-Web Services at CCC responded and made changes per our comments. (Thanks again, Audrey!)

Now, if you have somethin’ nice to say, let Audrey know. If you’d like to see some changes (major or just tweaks), make a comment. Anonymity encouraged. If you see some problems or concerns, say so. District, Audrey specifically, listened once and I do believe she’d listen again.

So, have at it peeps! You’ve accessed the pages. What do you think? Your students are viewing them. What have they told you? Tolle Blege!

 

Posted in Advice, Faculty, Students | Tagged: , , | 8 Comments »

Read the whole thing! After the introductory remarks the Mayor lays out his vision for City Colleges! If there is only one academic school left in a seven school system, who is served?

Posted by speechfromtheblock on January 24, 2012

“We are going to remake our community college system into a skills-based, vocational-based educational system.” Rahm Emanuel

Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s Speech to the Economic Club of Chicago

Remarks As Prepared

John, thank you for the introduction. Congratulations on your victory tonight. Now you have two organizations to lead: the Economic Club and Republicans for Rahm.

John, don’t get your priorities out of order. I’m counting on you.

John has become the leader of an organization that has helped Chicago make the most of its challenges for more than 80 years.

But tonight is unique in the Economic Club’s history. Yes, we have executives from all types of industry. Many of you have helped turn Chicago into the global city it has become.

But I also want to single out the young leaders of Chicago’s future who are sitting beside you. In this room is a sample of the teachers, doctors, lawyers, ministers, and executives, who will shape Chicago in the years to come. Believe me, that future is not too far away.

It seems like five minutes ago I was a kid working for Congressman Paul Simon when he was running for Senate, and later had the honor of working for Mayor Daley. Back then I was brash, profane, competitive, and very young. Now I’m just brash, profane, and competitive.

But I don’t want the young people here to get the wrong idea. Those are not the qualities you need to be Mayor, just the qualities I needed to compete with my two brothers.

When I was growing up, my brothers never would have imagined I would be here tonight, addressing the Economic Club of Chicago. And when I started out in politics, I don’t think the members of the Economic Club thought I would be addressing them as Mayor.

The Economic Club has hosted Prime Minister Tony Blair, GE CEO Jack Welch and President Jimmy Carter.

After World War Two, you invited General Omar Bradley. What made his speech remarkable was how little he spoke of his victories on the battlefield. Instead, he warned that what led to his success would not work for America in the future. He was right. The battlefield was about to change.

In the 1950s, you hosted a young Senator and future president, John Fitzgerald Kennedy. Then Senator Kennedy told the Economic Club that our country’s ties with new nations and emerging markets would determine its future. He was right. Think about that: in the 1950s he saw over the horizon and into the 21st century and the global economy that we know today.

Both General Bradley and President Kennedy made the most of their time here by discussing the dangers and opportunities ahead.

We too have an opportunity tonight, not to dwell on our city’s past, but to look to our future and to build a stronger Chicago.

Nobody respects the leaders in this room more than I do. So I am going to pay you the ultimate compliment: the compliment of candor and honesty.

I’m here to talk about what we must do to rebuild and re-imagine our educational system.

We have the best kids in the world, but when they emerge from the system, whether from our high schools or community colleges, they lag far behind their peers, both in this country and around the world. We are not providing them an education that allows them to live up to their full potential.

That should matter to all of us because these are Chicago’s children. And whether we are from the Northside, Westside, Southside, or downtown, we are one Chicago. We have one future.

The task is enormous but the equation is simple: the future of Chicago hinges on the future of our school system. That is the equation that drives me every day.

We all know this: education is the great equalizer. If you provide people an education, a city and a country will succeed.

I know I’m not the first politician to point that out, or say that changes in education are urgently needed. Some elected officials have said that early childhood is the key – and they are right. Others have stressed strong high schools, and math and science — and they are right.

But when it comes to investing in education, it can’t be multiple-choice. It must be all of the above.

From the cradle to the career, from kindergarten to college—that is where we must invest our resources and our time.

When you look at the educational debate of the past 30 years, there has been a great deal of focus on the early years, the high school years, and our four-year institutions.

What has not been a focus since the creation of the GI Bill is our community colleges, despite the fact that community colleges are where a majority of America’s students go for post-secondary education or training. By overlooking these critical centers of learning, we are missing an important opportunity. And our economy is now showing the strains of these years of neglect.

When employers can’t find skilled workers during one of the deepest recessions in American history, that should tell us something: we have a tool in our arsenal that is not doing all it can for our students. It must be modernized for the new economy.

Our community colleges were a linchpin of America’s post war boom and they are just as critical today.

They are as important to our economic growth and potential as a city as any other part of our educational system. Modernizing them is how we will continue to attract industries and make the most of our strengths. Think about this: there are more students in our City Colleges, 127,000, than in all of Chicago’s four-year institutions combined.

Now don’t get me wrong, Chicago and the state of Illinois have great institutions of higher learning. We know them: Northwestern, University of Chicago, University of Illinois, Depaul, Columbia College, Loyola, Roosevelt, UIC.

We have two of the top five business schools in the country in Booth and Kellogg. We have great law schools. In technology we have IIT, Fermi, Argonne labs, and U of I.

Chicago is also the destination of choice for graduates from the Big Ten States, be they from Madison, Columbus, Ann Arbor, Iowa City, East Lansing, Minneapolis / Saint Paul, Indianapolis, or South Bend.

What we have overlooked in the development of our workforce is the preparation of our own children. We have not developed the educational system that helps our economy grow.

We can no longer allow the practices of the past to sabotage our hopes for the future.

When I talk to CEO’s I hear a regular message from them about their workforce and the skills they need. Whether that’s Pat Woertz at ADM, Glenn Tilton at United, Glen Tullman at Allscripts, Randall Stephenson at AT&T, Jamie Dimon at at JP Morgan, Vikram Pandit at Citibank, or some of you in this room. You all tell me the same thing: from welders, to code-writers, to workers in healthcare and IT services, you need more skilled employees.

We need skilled workers to rebuild our infrastructure, we need them to care for the sick; we need them to welcome the millions who visit Chicago each year in our hospitality industry; we need them to make the products people want to buy; and to write the code that powers new technologies.

But employers can’t find skilled workers and workers can’t find jobs. Like the rest of the country, Chicago has a skills gap.

And we can’t say we haven’t been warned. I want to give you a set of headlines, literally, from just the last four weeks:

From The Wall Street Journal, November 16th: quote — Study finds US workers under pressure to improve skills, but need more support. — unquote

In The Wall Street Journal on November 25th : quote – In an unexpected twist some skilled jobs go begging – unquote

From Crain’s on December 2nd in an article, Closing the tech-skills gap — quote — More than 60% of small businesses are struggling to find skilled applicants. – unquote

From the Chicago Tribune, a week ago, on December 6th: quote – Jobs go unfilled as skills fall flat. – unquote

But I don’t need to read about the skills gap in The Wall Street Journal or the Tribune or Crain’s. I see it and hear about it everyday.

Riding the El six weeks ago, I met a young man who was commuting from Harold Washington Community College where he studies business and computers to his job at a Target warehouse.

That young man is doing everything right. He’s studying, he’s holding down a job. He is doing everything we can ask of him to give himself a better shot at a future.

So when he puts Harold Washington on his resume, that should mean something to his employer. It should have economic value to him.

The basic agreement is you take responsibility, and we’ll provide you opportunity. That young man is taking responsibility but we are not living up to our side of the bargain.

Can we honestly say to ourselves that we are doing everything we can for him, that he is getting the best from us?

When he walks into a job interview, and it says Harold Washington or Malcolm X College on his resume, his hard work should pay-off. If we work together, starting tonight, it will.

Because the young man looking for opportunity and the CEO in the corporate suite, looking for skilled workers, are looking for the same thing.

The community college is the link our employees and employers need, but it has been missing in action.

Companies need workers who make the products, design the products, wire the products, move the products and sell the products – and community colleges can provide them.

As Mayor, I cannot read the headlines about a skills gap, I can’t see it everyday in our city, and say that it’s not my problem.

It is my problem — because it’s unconscionable to me that we can have more than 100,000 job openings, and close to a 10% unemployment rate.

It is because I know that we have exactly what we need to answer the challenge, both for employees and employers, and it is right here under our nose: our community college system.

Let’s be candid: most community colleges offer students what they should have learned in high school. Too often, they provide remedial learning to compensate for gaps in their education. That is not why our community college system was established.

Community colleges were the catapult for the World War II generation coming home from the battlefield, the generation of Americans who became the most productive and economically expansive in American history. They can serve that same function in the 21st century.

At the beginning of the 20th century, a high school education was a necessity for the industrial economy. At the beginning of the 21st century, two years of quality post-secondary education are equally essential.

That’s especially true here in Chicago when you look at our engines of growth: transportation and logistics, healthcare sciences, IT, conventions and tourism, professional services, and high-end manufacturing.

We need our community colleges linked up to those growth sectors. And to do that, we need our industry leaders linked up to those schools.

Because of our central location, we are a transportation and logistics juggernaut, but we cannot rest on our location alone.

The question is: will we train the skilled workers we need to capitalize on the advantages we have?

Because of our private sector leadership with Abbott Labs, Walgreens, Baxter, and Allscripts, and our hospitals, like Rush, Stroger, Northwestern and University of Chicago, we are becoming a global healthcare sciences hub.

The question is: Will we train for it?

Because of McCormick Place and O’Hare, we continue to be a world-leader in tourism and conventions.

The question is: Will we train for it?

Because of Navistar, Ford, and ArcelorMittal steel, we can serve as a national center for high-end manufacturing.

The question is: Will we train for it?

Because of Motorola Solutions, Molex, and GroupOn, we can be the nation’s next hot spot for technology and innovation.

The question is: Will we train for it?

Because we are home to great global businesses like Aon, Boeing and United, and we are home to great law firms, and great consulting firms like Accenture, and great accounting firms like Ernst and

Young, we are the professional services center of the Midwest.

The question is: Will we train for it?

Because we are about to launch the largest infrastructure investment for a city, not just for our water but for our roads, and soon for our mass transit, we will need a strong partnership with labor. We will need workers in skilled trades.

The question is: will we train for it?

And tonight, here in this room, we answer that fundamental question.

Tonight, we charge our community colleges with a new mission: to train the workforce of today for the jobs of tomorrow; to give our students the ability to achieve a middle class standard of living; to provide our companies with the skilled workers they need.

Cities like Miami and Louisville have tried something similar — but in a single industry, with a single school. Miami matched a community college to train students in the healthcare sciences. Louisville has linked a community college with UPS to be a leader in logistics.

But this is Chicago. We need something bigger, more ambitious, and more comprehensive, something to match the diversity and depth of our economy, which is one of our strengths.

So tonight, I am announcing that we will tailor six of our community colleges to train students in a specific sector, where we know we can dominate the future.

We are announcing our first two schools and their partners tonight.

Malcolm X College will be the school that drives Chicago’s leadership in the healthcare sciences.

Rush Medical Center, Stroger and Northwestern Hospitals, Advocate Healthcare, Baxter, Walgreens and Allscripts have agreed to partner with Malcolm X College, to develop their curriculum and train the faculty.

Olive Harvey College will be our center for excellence in transportation, distribution, and logistics. They will work with UPS, Canadian National Railway, AAR, and BNSF, among others. They will be Olive Harvey’s partners in modernizing their programs and providing the training students need to compete in the transportation and logistics field.

As Mayor of Chicago, I can’t protect our city from a global or national recession. But I can address a skills gap – so that no employer, in the middle of a deep recession, is without the employees they must have – so that no worker is without the skills they need to find a job.

We have a dynamic Chancellor of our community college system, Cheryl Hyman, and I’ve appointed each of the six new City College presidents to oversee this modernization.

But this reinvention, and the investments required to make our school-system world class, is something that all of us must be a part of.

Reinvention is nothing new to our city. Chicago went from a remote trading post to a center of global industry. From the cinders of the great fire, our city became a showcase for the world in its architecture.

Chicago did not reinvent itself by itself. Our growth was forged by those who were willing to make the tough choices and the right investments, by people who were not afraid to see the future, with all its challenges, as an opportunity.

Today, we must be those people.

And tonight, I ask you, to be a partner in the transformation of our community colleges.

Every year we will modernize two new schools and match them with partners in the private sector, to train the workers for our factories, for our offices, for our hospitals, for our hotel industry and for our infrastructure.

We are going to remake our community college system into a skills-based, vocational-based educational system.

In the same way that you help Booth and Kellogg prepare their graduates for careers in management and finance, we need you to partner with our community colleges — so that their curriculums meet the needs of the sectors that power the Chicago economy.

I’m not talking about hiring one person or even a partnership. It’s more than that. This is about ensuring that the curriculum taught at community colleges provides the skills you need at your place of employment.

By making a diploma from our community colleges into a ticket to the workforce, we will make them a first option for job training and not a last resort.

I do not expect you to do this alone. Our community college leaders will be right there with you. And whatever you invest in our schools, you will get back many times over in the skills of your employees and your ability to grow.

There is no greater investment we can make in the life of our city, than the one we make in the lives of our students.

And I can also tell you, there is no greater reward.

Meeting young people on the campaign trail or in my visits to schools as Mayor, that’s something I’ve learned over and over again.

Every day our students wake up optimistic about their future. They believe they can achieve great things and so many of them do, sometimes against great odds.

If our students have the strength to turn obstacles into opportunities, surely, the adults do as well.

Some say that a comprehensive investment in all levels of education, in all our communities, is impossible. Today’s fiscal challenges make it more difficult.

Yes we have to set priorities. Yes, we have to make tough choices. And that’s what we’re doing tonight.

But to those who say that we can’t afford to confront these challenges, I say, we can’t afford not to.

And let me tell you something: we’re already doing it in K through 12.

Four new charter-schools opened this year, serving 2,000 more students. Five more will come on line next year. 2,300 more kids attend magnet schools of excellence this year. 6,000 more children have full-day kindergarten.

And this year, at my urging 13 Chicago public schools are offering a full school day. An additional 36 charter schools serving 17,000 students citywide will join them and transition to a full school day next month.

We’ve begun the largest turnaround of our neighborhood schools. Next year ten schools will be staffed by new principals and new teachers, many trained by AUSL, which has a proven record of success.

Beginning next year, every public school student in Chicago will have an additional 250 hours of time on task learning the fundamentals.

At Howe School in Chicago, that means 55 more hours on task for more Math. That’s 55 more hours in reading and writing. That’s 55 more hours on task for our students to study science.

But a full day won’t matter unless we’re willing and able to make the most of it. We need to strengthen the three pillars behind every student’s success: a principle who is accountable, a teacher who is motivated, and a parent who is engaged.

That is the combination that can unlock achievement for all our students, in all our communities.

And if we make those investments in accountability and opportunity, we can ensure that when students arrive at a four-year institution or community college, that they are ready for the next level, to compete and win.

When it comes to modernizing our public education system and community colleges, I will not take no for an answer.

Any business that stands pat as the world changes is a business that’s doomed to failure. And our city has no more important business than educating our students.

Change is always difficult. The status quo is more comfortable.

In seven months in this job, I have come to the conclusion that people hate the status quo … and they are not too excited about change either.

But when the status quo is failing, then change is inevitable. We can resolve to help shape the future or allow ourselves to be shaped by it.

The people in this room tonight are leaders and not followers. And I’m not just talking about the members of the Economic Club. I’m talking about the young people who have joined us.

This is the future of Chicago. For the kids in this room, and the students throughout Chicago, we must resolve to do everything we can to make sure they are successful.

I firmly believe that we can overcome any obstacle if we are willing to confront our challenges with vision and determination. That’s why I ran for the job of Mayor and I believe that’s why the people of Chicago elected me. In the past months we have started the fight for change and, with your help, we will continue it. We can ensure that the future of our city and every student will be unlimited.

We can be sure that our children and grandchildren can be as proud to call Chicago their home as we are today.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless Chicago.

# # #

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

Tuesday Teaching Talk (TTT)

Posted by mathissexy on January 24, 2012

Tuesday Teaching Talk is a regular feature which, as the name implies, is an opportunity to talk explicitly about teaching (and learning) in the practical and philosophical sense that happens on, you guessed it, Tuesday. Hold on to your hats.  The CAST coordinators (yes there are 2 of us) are tasked with supplying TTTs to you.  Look for questions, videos, tips, etc.  Enjoy!

A few quick adverts…

1) Today is the first CAST Pedagogy Subgroup meeting at 2 in 1046.

2) Thursday is the first of four Thursday Teaching Talks (a different/new TTT; CAST loves the letter T apparently).  This Thursday is Cookies and CAST where we’ll discuss creating crumbs of curiosity in our teaching.

Without further ado, here’s today’s TTT.

Share a non-astonishing teaching tip.

Posted in CAST, Teaching, TTT | Tagged: , , | 10 Comments »

Gung Hay Fat Choy!

Posted by PhiloDave on January 23, 2012

Wish a happy new year to our students and colleagues who recognize the Chinese calendar, today.

And don’t be afraid to celebrate a little yourself!

 

Posted in News, Social, Students, Teaching | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Monday Music

Posted by PhiloDave on January 23, 2012

Oh, sure, you can’t go wrong with “Tell Mama,” and “Baby What You Want Me to Do” is a guaranteed winner/smile inducer, and there’s really nothing to say about “At Last,” but I do so love this one:

R.I.P. Etta James. My, my what a voice.

Posted in Music | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers